Introduction to Asset Allocation

June 24, 2026

Presented by Rich LeBranti

Asset allocation is the process of dividing your investment dollars among a variety of complementary asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, real estate, and short‑term, highly liquid vehicles—including money market funds—so that your portfolio is well diversified.

The ultimate objective of an asset allocation program is to develop an investment portfolio that is properly aligned with your investment objectives and risk tolerance. A well‑diversified portfolio, while unlikely to outperform the top asset class in any given year, is often one of the most popular ways to pursue long‑term financial goals.

Key benefits of a sound asset allocation strategy include:

  • Reduced risk: A properly allocated portfolio strives to lower volatility, or fluctuation in return, by simultaneously spreading market risk across several asset class categories.
  • Opportunity for more consistent returns: By investing in a variety of asset classes, you can improve your chances of participating in market gains and lessen the impact of poorly performing asset class categories on overall results.
  • A greater focus on long‑term goals: A properly allocated portfolio is designed to alleviate the need to constantly adjust investment positions to chase market trends. It can also help reduce the urge to buy or sell in response to short‑term market swings.

Asset Allocation in Practice

Although there is a broad range of asset classes in which you can invest, a strong allocation strategy includes stocks, bonds, real estate, and cash equivalent instruments.

The first chart illustrates the performance of each of these core asset class categories for the 20‑year period ending December 31, 2024. During this time period, stocks outperformed bonds, and bonds outdistanced money markets. In turn, the volatility declined from stocks to money markets.

In any given 20‑year time period, one can expect the various asset classes to perform differently and to assume varied levels of volatility in relation to one another.

Proponents of asset allocation argue that rather than investing in a single asset class, investors should consider allocating a portion of their portfolios to several asset class categories in an effort to achieve higher risk‑adjusted returns over time. The theory behind this approach was developed in 1952 by economist Harry Markowitz, who discovered that overall portfolio risk can be reduced by combining various asset classes whose returns are not perfectly correlated or whose returns do not move in unison.

Markowitz’s Nobel Prize‑winning theory, Modern Portfolio Theory, is illustrated by the second chart. A diversified portfolio, which held 35 percent in stocks, 45 percent in bonds, 10 percent in real estate, and 10 percent in cash equivalent instruments, performed almost as well as the all‑stock portfolio. It captured 81 percent of the return of the all‑stock portfolio, with 46 percent less volatility—a trade-off most investors would gladly accept and one that illustrates how effective asset allocation can be.

A well‑diversified portfolio, while unlikely to outperform the top asset class in any given year, is often one of the most popular ways to pursue long‑term financial goals.

Another study, published in 1991 by Gary Brinson, Brian Singer, and Gilbert Beebower, further cemented the value and benefits of asset allocation, concluding that the asset classes used, and the extent to which each is weighted in an investor’s portfolio, are the most important decisions an investor can make. They determined that asset allocation decisions account for approximately 92 percent of a portfolio’s long‑term performance. Individual investment selection accounts for only 5 percent, while other factors—market timing included—account for a mere 3 percent of portfolio performance.

This study supports the idea that in addition to the core asset categories—stocks, bonds, real estate, and cash equivalent instruments—investors should consider including subasset class categories, particularly as their portfolios increase in value.

Within the equity arena, these subcategories might include multiple styles (value, blend, growth), company sizes (small‑, mid‑, and large‑cap), and geographic regions (foreign and domestic). In the fixed income arena, one might consider government bonds, corporate bonds, mortgages, and municipalities, with a conscious effort to include bonds of varying maturity and credit quality. Diversification at this level can further dampen volatility, as various subcategories often react differently to changing economic and market conditions.

The process of determining which asset classes to include and the appropriate weights to assign to each is, in part, defined by your time horizon, risk tolerance, and familiarity or comfort level with the financial markets and various investment products.

The Efficient Frontier

The outgrowth of Markowitz’s work on Modern Portfolio Theory was the development of a plotted graph identifying portfolios that have the maximum expected return for any given level of risk, or the minimum level of risk for an infinite number of asset class combinations.

By plotting each portfolio or combination of asset classes on one axis and the volatility measures—or standard deviations—on another, a line graph representing the optimal combination of asset classes for various levels of risk is produced. This graph is known as the “efficient frontier.”

Points on or under the curve (in the darker area) represent the possible combinations of investments. Points above the curve (in the lighter area) are unobtainable combinations given the particular set of available asset class categories. The curve itself represents where you could not obtain higher average returns without generating higher volatility or where you could not obtain lower volatility without generating lower average returns.

The portfolios that lie directly on the curve are viewed as efficient, which is why the curve itself is called the efficient frontier. Portfolios that lie below the curve are deemed inefficient, as alternative portfolios exist with higher returns, lower volatility, or both.

Using efficient frontier analysis, advisors can select which asset classes to include in a given portfolio and then view all possible combinations of those asset classes to help determine the most appropriate mix for each client.

The benefits of the revolutionary efforts of Markowitz and others in the financial arena at one point in time were largely reserved for institutional and high‑net‑worth investors who were able to access the high‑level mathematicians and computer systems needed to capture, calculate, and report risk and return data on a multitude of asset class categories.

Today, with advances in computer technology and additional studies done to quantify the true value of the asset allocation decision, sophisticated software programs are available to help financial planners and investment advisors construct and manage client portfolios for investors at any level.

Things to Remember

Asset allocation is a critical element to any sound investment plan. By building a portfolio that encompasses a wide selection of securities and a broad range of asset classes and investment styles, you can help protect your portfolio from sudden changes in the financial markets. A diversified strategy can potentially help you attain your long‑term goals more readily and with additional financial confidence.

There can be no guarantee that any particular yield or return will be achieved from any investment. Investors should note that diversification or asset allocation strategies do not assure a profit or protect against market loss and that there is no guarantee that a diversified portfolio will outperform a nondiversified portfolio, or that any objective or goal will be achieved.

A change in your goals, time horizon, risk tolerance, or personal financial situation may require a change in your strategic asset allocation, which is why it’s important to periodically review your asset allocation strategy. For example, as your time horizon shortens, you may have less time to recoup losses from sudden market downturns. Therefore, you might consider a more conservative asset mix. In contrast, investors whose financial situation has improved significantly or who have become more comfortable and experienced with more volatile assets, such as stocks, might shift to a more aggressive allocation strategy.

Asset allocation is a critical element to any sound investment plan. By building a portfolio that encompasses a wide selection of securities and a broad range of asset classes and investment styles, you can help protect your portfolio from sudden changes in the financial markets.

Fluctuations in the financial markets may also necessitate a reassessment of your portfolio. For example, if you begin an investment program with 75 percent of your money in stocks, 20 percent in bonds, and 5 percent in money market funds, several years of strong stock market performance could quickly shift your allocations. The resulting, unplanned overexposure—or in negative conditions, underexposure—to an asset class may not be in keeping with your risk tolerance, investment goals, and time horizon.

That’s why it is important to maintain an ongoing dialogue with your financial professional to establish and periodically rebalance your portfolio, so you can help ensure that your investment plan remains consistent with your long‑term goals.

© 2025 Commonwealth Financial Network®

Investments are subject to risk, including the loss of principal. Some investments are not suitable for all investors, and there is no guarantee that any investing goal will be met. Real estate investments are subject to a high degree of risk because of general economic or local market conditions; changes in supply or demand; competing properties in an area; changes in interest rates; and changes in tax, real estate, environmental, or zoning laws and regulations. An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other governmental agency; although the fund seeks to preserve the value of the investment at $1 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The S&P 500 Index is a market capitalization‑weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. It measures the movement of the largest issues. Standard & Poor’s chooses the member companies for the 500 based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. The Russell 2000 Index consists of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index, representing small‑ to mid‑cap stock exposure. The MSCI EAFE Index is a free float‑adjusted market capitalization index designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad base, market capitalization weighted bond market index representing intermediate‑term investment grade bonds traded in the U.S. These include government debt, mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, and corporate bonds. The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD‑denominated, high‑yield, fixed‑rate corporate bond market. The Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM) is composed of futures contracts and reflects the returns on a fully collateralized investment in the BCOM. This combines the returns of the BCOM with the returns on cash collateral invested in 13‑week (3‑month) U.S. Treasury bills. The BofA Merrill Lynch 3‑Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index measures the performance of a single issue of outstanding treasury bill that matures closest to, but not beyond, three months from the rebalancing date. The Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index tracks the performance of publicly traded REITs and REIT‑like securities and is designed to serve as a proxy for direct real estate investment, in part by excluding companies whose performance may be driven by factors other than the value of real estate. The Diversified Portfolio Benchmark is composed of 12% MSCI EAFE USD, 2.5% Russell 2000 Index, 43.25% Bloomberg Aggregate Bond, 1.75% Bloomberg High Yield Corporate Bond, 10% Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, and 10% BofA Merrill Lynch 3-month T‑Bill Index.

Recent Posts

The Medicare Cost Surprise Many Retirees Never See Coming

It often starts with a confusing letter. You open a notice from Medicare and learn that your premiums are increasing next year—sometimes by more than $1,000. Naturally, you wonder what changed. You didn’t retire again. You didn’t take a lavish vacation. You didn’t...

Tidying Up Financial Clutter

Spark joy and part with all those old statements, tax returns, and utility bills. You just watched the show with that organizing consultant who helps people de-clutter their lives. It’s inspiring seeing others go through closets and part with useless stuff they’ve...

What the Supreme Court’s Tariff Decision Means for Markets and Trade

On February 20th, the Supreme Court struck down most of the tariffs the Trump administration had imposed over the past year. The question before the court was not whether the tariffs themselves were illegal, but whether the mechanism by which they were enacted was...